E-Disclosure 2009 programme
Day 1 – Monday 8th June 2009
9:00 Registration and Refreshments
9:30 Chairman’s Opening Remarks
Chair: Lee Gluyas, Partner, DLA Piper UK LLP
9:45 KEYNOTE PRESENTATION
THE EMPTY BEAR GARDEN
Lawyers, including judges, will lose their role to others if
they do not change what they offer. Other professionals, other
jurisdictions and the clients themselves are challenging the
old ways of resolving commercial disputes. Common law discovery
remains the best way to find the facts but lawyers must adapt
their methods to a world in which volumes must go up as surely
as costs must come down. Chris Dale of the e-Disclosure Information
Project sets the scene for the programme to follow.
Chris Dale, Consultant, E-Disclosure Information Project
10:30 WHAT THE COURT EXPECTS
• Part 31
• The Practice Direction
• Recent cases
• A new Practice Direction
Richard Harrison, Partner, Laytons
11:15 Morning Coffee Break
11:45 THE VIEW OF THE CASE MANAGEMENT JUDGE
Master Whitaker will speak about the court’s expectations
of parties and about developments in other jurisdictions who
grapple with the same issues. The obligation to discuss sources
of electronic documents existed before Digicel and a Technology
Questionnaire and Practice Direction are in hand under Master
Whitaker’s direction. This session will complement the
practitioner’s view delivered earlier by Richard Harrison.
Master Whitaker, Senior Master of the Queen’s Bench
Division, Royal Courts of Justice
12.00 PRESERVING DATA FOR E-DISCLOSURE: BEST PRACTICES
IN FORENSIC INVESTIGATION
• Emerging issues in digital forensics
• The difference between forensics and e-disclosure
• Data privacy and its impact on data collection
• Communicating requirements and ensuring adherence to
protocols
• Preparing electronic evidence for digital investigations
• Considerations for continuing obligation
Robert Brown, Senior Director, Litigation Consulting Services,
First Advantage
12.30 PANEL DISCUSSION
A practical view of the elements that surround the civil procedure rules
• What is considered a reasonable search?
• What is reasonable in the context of electronic disclosure versus paper
disclosure?
• How has it changed over time?
• What can technology do to make the process less expensive?
Greg Wildisen, International Managing Director, eDiscovery Solutions,
Epiq Systems
Master Whitaker, Senior Master of the Queen’s Bench Division, Royal
Courts of Justice
Vince Neicho, Litigation Support Specialist, Allen & Overy LLP
13:15 Networking Lunch Break
14:15 ADDING VALUE TO YOUR CASE WITH LITIGATION
SUPPORT MANAGEMENT
• The effect of changing trends on the role of the litigation
support management
• Deciding on what to outsource and what to bring in-house
• Selecting litigation support service providers and;
• Establishing service-level commitments
Vince Neicho, Litigation Support Specialist, Allen &
Overy LLP
15:00 FEATURED PRESENTATION
THE FIRST REVIEW OF LORD JUSTICE JACKSON’S LITIGATION
COST WORKING PAPER
• Investigating the different levels of litigation, from
low-value to mega-cases
• Considering the costs incurred in all specialist courts
• Discussing limitations pointed out by leading litigators
Lord Justice Jackson, Royal Courts of Justice
15:45 Afternoon Coffee Break
16:05 ANALYSING THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION ADVISORY
REVIEW ON THE IMPACT OF DATA PROTECTION AND PRIVACY LAWS
• Reviewing the advisory note of the Article 29 Working
Party
• Bringing data protection laws, privacy laws and how
they affect data when undergoing e-disclosure process to the
forefront
• Why is the outcome of this review important for your
law firm?
Ashley Winton, Partner, White & Case
16.50 WORKING IN PARTNERSHIP – IS WHAT YOU RECEIVE
WHAT YOU EXPECT?
• When the Record is both Written and Electronic –
Will there be a problem?
• Coding may not show the diagnoses expected? Examples
of Case Studies
• What information do you want and will it be what you
get?
• Will local expertise in Electronic Systems match expectations?
Margaret Bennett, Medical Records Manager, Imperial College
Healthcare NHS Trust
17:35 Chairman’s Closing Remarks
17.45 End of Day One
Day 2 – Tuesday, 9th June
9:00 Refreshments
9:30 Chairman’s Opening Remarks
Chair: Chris Dale, Consultant, E-Disclosure Information
Project
09:45 Mitigating the risk of failure to comply with
solid records management in e-disclosure
• Reviewing the compliance for storage of electronic documents
• Which IT aspects and systems need to be compliant?
• Which standards must be adhered to in records management?
• What are the challenges in these projects?
Daniel Burgwinkel, Project Manager Private Banking Operations,
Credit Suisse Group AG
10:30 E-evidences seizing and their archiving
• Crime activity areas in cyberspace
• New areas of attacks and related consequences
• Problems of e-evidences seizing guidelines
• E-evidences after trial
• Repeatability of e-evidences several years later
• E-evidence archiving – not only data but devices,
too
Zdenek Blazek, Assistant Vice President, CSO, IT Production
Manager, Commerzbank AG
11:15 Morning coffee break
11:45 How to manage e-disclosure in an international dispute
• Planning the e-disclosure exercise
• Pitfalls to avoid
• Culture and language issues
• Managing costs
Stuart Paterson, Partner, Herbert Smith LLP
12:30 Disclosure and the reasonable man
The rules, the case law and proportionality drive solicitors
towards
broad decisions aimed at reducing the volumes which are disclosed,
often with the use of technology. Many solicitors and their
clients are concerned at the potential for something vital to be overlooked.
What does the reasonable man do when confronted by hundreds
of thousands of documents? Mark Surguy looks at the implications
as between solicitor and client.
Mark Surguy, Senior Associate, Pinsent Masons LLP
13:15 Networking lunch break
14:15 Analysing the European Commission advisory review on the
impact of data protection and privacy laws
• Reviewing the advisory note of the Article 29 Working
Party
• Bringing data protection laws, privacy laws and how
they affect data
when undergoing e-disclosure process to the forefront
• Why is the outcome of this review important for your
law firm?
Ashley Winton, Partner, White & Case LLP
15:00 The skeleton in the e-cupboard
• "You must be stupid, stupid, stupid" (The
Rainmaker)
• How e-disclosure can save your life
• How not to waive privilege by accident
• Challenges and implications for shareholder and cartel
actions
Jeremy Marshall, Head of London Commercial Litigation, Irwin
Mitchell
15:45 Afternoon coffee break
16:15 Asserting privilege in the electronic age
• Group/forwarded e-mails
• Assessing sole/dominant purpose
• Who is the client?
• Who is a third party?
• Circle of confidentiality
• Waiver
• Unravelling complex chains of communications
• Systems, headers and e-mail filing
• Retaining LPP
Sean Jeffrey, Of Counsel, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer
LLP
17:00 PANEL DISCUSSION
Reviewing the past and looking ahead of e-disclosure practices
and cross-disciplinary information retention
This session will look forward at the field of e-disclosure
and predict how future changes and developments will impact litigation as
well as information retention practices.
Chris Dale, Consultant, E-Disclosure Information Project
Mark Surguy, Senior Associate, Pinsent Masons LLP
Vince Neicho, Litigation Support Specialist, Allen & Overy
LLP
17:45 Chair’s closing remarks
17:55 End of day two and close of the conference
Home | Register
http://www.edisclosure2009.co.uk/
Copyright ©1994-2010 Ark Group Ltd All rights reserved.
No part of this site or the publications described herein may be reproduced in
any form without the permission of Ark Conferences Ltd, Registered in England,
No. 2931372.





